Subject:
|
Re: A few things...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 May 2005 14:34:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3269 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
|
<snipping>
| |
| |
| |
| |
Correct. Because then we would have been satisfied that he didn’t have
WMDs at his disposal to possibly provide to terrorists.
|
What WMD’s????
|
The ones the UN believed that he hadn’t destroyed.
|
...based on a case made by the USA.
|
Yes. Point?
<snip>
| |
No John. It is a question directed at you. I shall try again:
Can you list any terror acts against the USA which SH sponsored?
|
Who knows?
|
OK; so you can’t list any then.
| |
I know he aided and abetted terrorists. Whether they were the
actually ones involved in terrorism against the US is anyone’s guess.
|
So you’re guessing now?
| |
The
point is that he was a friend of terrorism and an enemy to freedom
|
No doubt the Uzbeks say the same about the USA.
| |
as well > as our allies-- we took him out.
|
So basically, you spent billions and killed tens of thousands to help Israel
hold on to illegally obtained land?
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
He used WMDs against
his own people.
|
Yep, and he got them from Washington.
|
I don’t care if he got them from Uranus, it doesn’t justify using them.
|
What is the difference between gassing Kurds and napalming civilians? Why
not start with your own backyard?
|
Squirm. Stay on topic or lose me forever.
|
**sigh**
Your lack of an answer says a lot about you.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
That means that he had no compunction with associating with
such swine (I chose “swine” because it is particularily offensive to
Muslims) or murdering innocents on a massive scale.
|
What about Washington’s support for “such swine” and its “murdering
innocents on a massive scale”?
|
See WWII Stalin ally argument.
|
Lol. The Nazi war machine rolled up a whole continent like a fireside rug.
There is no comparison.
|
Sorry. The comparison is spot on. We formed a sort of unholy alliance with
SH when the greater enema was the Ayatolla of Iran.
|
Please don’t forget that the Reagan administration was also selling arms to
Iran.
| |
Same with Stalin against
the Nazis. Get it?
|
OK. Show us how the “Ayatolla of Iran” is in the same league as Nazi Germany.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
That made him public enema number
one.
|
No. Spin did that. It fooled people like you.
|
And, apparently, Clinton as well...
|
...you sound like you respect his judgment?
|
No, thought you did, which is why I mentioned him.
<snip>
| |
| |
| |
| |
The
threat of continued mass extermination of innocent Iraqis at the hands of
SH is gone.
|
Now the mass graves in Iraq are Bush’s making... and that of his rabid
supporters.
|
Add up body counts if you want to play the numbers game. US colateral
civilian damage vs SH slaughter total.
|
OK. Show me that SH’s ‘kill rate’ in the year before the war was greater
than the time since.
|
Boring. I’m too busy to prove the obvious to you.
|
**sigh**
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
The word is out to terrorists and those who would sponsor
terrorism-- the days of impotent UN sanctions and resolutions are gone--
we mean business, and we aren’t afraid to act; offensively if necessary.
|
|
|
But you are afraid to think. You should think about why the threat exists.
|
You have no idea why the threat exists. You think it is our fault. It
is, if you mean that we don’t happen to believe in radical Islam. Even
garden-variety Muslims aren’t safe from this threat! Don’t you get
that????
|
You really are a scared little man. Bottom line: Washington would have fewer
enemies if it supported freedom and killed less innocent people. If the USA had
not funded Israeli belligerence and propped up the Saudi regime for so long, 911
would not have happened.
| |
| |
| |
<snip> OT comment.
| |
| |
And if we hadn’t taken the fight to the terrorists, do you honestly
believe that the US would have gone almost 4 years without a follow-up
attack from OBL? If so, you are deluding yourself.
|
|
|
Everything I’ve read about the 911 attackers leads me to feel they may
have been a bunch of incompetent twits that outwitted another bunch of
incompetent twits in the USA and Germany.
|
I rest my case that what you read is crap.
|
Thanks for that great counter argument.
I have grown tired of your selective snippage and mock vitriol. Please go away
and take you arrogant brand of hypocrisy with you.
Best wishes
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) It's all a guessing game. We played it safe and took him out for good-- something that should have occured in '91. (...) No doubt we weren't talking about them. Start a new thread. (...) To help Israel so that they wouldn't be forced to defend (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) <snipping> (...) Yes. Point? <snip> (...) Who knows? I know he aided and abetted terrorists. Whether they were the actually ones involved in terrorism against the US is anyone's guess. The point is that he was a friend of terrorism and an (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
