Subject:
|
Re: level of debate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:26:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1475 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> >
> > > The text below was via an e-mail from a friend, it made me wonder just what
> > > the level of debate in the USA is. I ckecked out a couple and they appeared
> > > valid.
>
> To Scott: That's *nuthin'!* You should see what the *other* side is doing!
> The Anti-war crowd for the most part are radical fruitcakes. I mean, feminists
> protesting *naked*???? <shudder> Wearing *pink* to protest? It's all
> entertainment to the Left.
Please tally all protests and render the percentage of those that took place
naked. And what's wrong with pink? I mean, other than I won't be seen in
it? :-)
You seem to be taking the cheap-shot demonizing route in trying to belittle
a viewpoint you oppose.
> >
> > Well, be fair. Almost all are unattributed or from comedians.
>
> Exactly.
>
> > And
> > Limbaugh is hardly an icon of thoughtful debate.
>
> Easy there. It's so easy to slip into ad hominem attacks against Limbaugh
> because of his "schtick"-- his politics are pretty sound. (His zinger is the
> best one quoted, BTW:-)
Yup, he had the best zinger, but then he is a comedian like most of the
others - his politics certainly are laughable. ;-)
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: level of debate
|
| (...) To Scott: That's *nuthin'!* You should see what the *other* side is doing! The Anti-war crowd for the most part are radical fruitcakes. I mean, feminists protesting *naked*???? <shudder> Wearing *pink* to protest? It's all entertainment to the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
