Subject:
|
Re: A few things...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 May 2005 18:25:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2870 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Americans are dying for Iraqi freedom
|
WHAT????? You seem to have conveniently forgotten the war in Iraq was
primarily to remove the “threat” of nuclear weapons
|
What you seem to have never internalized is that we went into Iraq for one
reason, and one reason only-- to depose SH’s evil regime.
|
Rubish! If it was agreed he had complied with 1441, he would have been able
to stay in power.
|
Correct. Because then we would have been satisfied that he didn’t have WMDs at
his disposal to possibly provide to terrorists.
<snip off-topic material>
| |
| |
We issued an
ultimatum for him leave or we would make him.
|
That was a couple of days before the war. It is clear that even if he (and
his sons) did leave, Bush would still have invaded.
|
No, Scott, it is not “clear” by any stretch of the imagination. That is your
(ignorant, I might add) opinion.
| |
| |
He didn’t, and we did.
He was the threat, he was the link and sponsor of terrorism.
|
Can you evidence what terror acts against the USA he sponsored?
|
I can say that he sponsored terrorism against Israel. He used WMDs against his
own people. That means that he had no compunction with associating with such
swine (I chose “swine” because it is particularily offensive to Muslims) or
murdering innocents on a massive scale. That made him public enema number one.
| |
| |
The removal
of SH killed two birds with one stone-- increased world safety and
liberating a people from tyranny.
|
Can you evidence how the Iraq war has brought about “increased world safety”?
|
The threat of WMD falling into the hands of terrorists via SH is gone. The
threat of continued mass extermination of innocent Iraqis at the hands of SH is
gone. The word is out to terrorists and those who would sponsor terrorism-- the
days of impotent UN sanctions and resolutions are gone-- we mean business, and
we aren’t afraid to act; offensively if necessary.
And if we hadn’t taken the fight to the terrorists, do you honestly believe
that the US would have gone almost 4 years without a follow-up attack from OBL?
If so, you are deluding yourself.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) What WMD's???? But John, what about those poor Iraqis and their thirst for "Freedom"? (...) You need to read Plan of Attack. (...) Even if true, he still posed no threat to the USA(?) (...) Yep, and he got them from Washington. (...) What (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) Rubish! If it was agreed he had complied with 1441, he would have been able to stay in power. Anyhow, why start with him whilst training the (URL) Uzbek security forces> and bank-rolling (URL) Israeli belligerence>? (URL) Funded by Washington (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
