Subject:
|
Re: A few things...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 May 2005 18:14:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2539 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Let’s face it-- SH was an idiot. The guy read the tea leaves all wrong.
This is a guy who presumably had no WMDs, but led the world to believe that
he actually did. A fabrication to which he clung that led to his fall from
power. I’m sure that he didn’t think that the US would have the temerity to
attack despite the misgivings of the UN, which he was well adept at
manipulating.
|
I’m glad to see that revisionist history isn’t limited to the US
administration. Looks as if John has the bug as well.
|
Actually, I don’t adhere to that scenerio. I believe he actually was hiding
WMDs and their whereabouts is still unknown. But since we haven’t found any, I
am willing to concede the above scenerio, which would make SH out to be an
idiot.
It isn’t “revisionist history” to acknowledge that SH played the UN like a
fiddle (see: “UN oil for food” scandal)
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A few things...
|
| (...) SH was not the biggest fool on the world stage. (...) You mean the "scandal" (URL) and abetted> by Washington? Who do you think bought that oil and burned it in their bloated "SUV's"... your countrymen! John, you are being played like a (...) (19 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A few things...
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) I'm glad to see that revisionist history isn't limited to the US administration. Looks as if John has the bug as well. <snip> (...) Dave K (19 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
82 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
