Subject:
|
Help me with the math
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Sep 2004 19:49:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
706 times
|
| |
|
|
Now that George W. Bush has killed his 1,000th US
citizen in Iraq, does that make him approximately 33% as bad as Osama bin Laden,
who killed about 3,000 people in the WTC? Oh, wait--Bush has killed thousands
more than that, when you factor in all of the
Iraqis he’s killed for the sake of
their liberty.
And does this have anything to do with why Bush all but refuses even to mention
bin Laden’s name in the past half-dozen or so months?
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Help me with the math
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:I3osE0.EJL@lugnet.com... (...) 1,000th US (...) Laden, (...) thousands (...) sake of (...) mention (...) The main difference is that soldiers are asking for it. They are paying for bad US (...) (20 years ago, 7-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Help me with the math
|
| (...) So what about the 1-2 hundred thousand Saddam was not able to kill as political prisoners? (the longer we go the highet that number gets) It is estimated he killed 1.5 million between the two Gulf wars. Now don't get me wrong there are a lot (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
57 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
