To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24484
24483  |  24485
Subject: 
Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:52:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1235 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, J. Spencer Rezkalla wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

All of the Saturn tooling is no more.

(I should have said 'and infrastructure')

NASA admitted they did that on purpose to "focus efforts on the shuttle".
Arguably the Saturns would have been really great Big Dumb Boosters if heavy
lift was something that NASA was really interested in.

Well of course they did. Is there any reason to spend money to preserve and
maintain the tooling viability for a rocket that can no longer be launched?

This whole tooling issue reminds me about the destruction of the early Lego
moulds.


Nope. But if you get rid of one element then it becomes easier to justify
getting rid of the rest. The tooling was just the last thing to go in a whole
sorry parade of wanton waste and destruction.

If they had kept this stuff, I expect their critics would have harangued them
for wasting tax payer’s money maintaining and storing obsolete equipment.

Scott A


All
the existing Saturn launch infrastructure was modified for shuttle use. The
launch towers are gone, the mobile service structure, extensive mods in the VAB,
and a bunch of other geek level stuff.

Each and every one a bad decision. You're making my point for me. NASA wanted to
be shut of the Saturn any way it could, and it's a typical bureacratic tactic to
get rid of (or build) one thing that no one will notice, then use that as
justification for the next, till you've got the whole thing gone (or built, as
the case may be)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
 
(...) (I should have said 'and infrastructure') (...) Nope. But if you get rid of one element then it becomes easier to justify getting rid of the rest. The tooling was just the last thing to go in a whole sorry parade of wanton waste and (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

81 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR