Subject:
|
Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:55:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1060 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> That's absolute nonsense.
>
> I could say more on this topic at this time but I'm not sure it's a good use
> of my time.
If this is such a monumental waste of your time, perhaps you'd prefer to get
back to our discussion of whether or not tritium can be harnessed as an economic
power source? I seem to remember a similar response when I pointed out that
we'd need to develop cold-fusion to do so. If I'm wrong, and you can actually
prove it, do so. Stop brushing me off by telling me that I need to do more
research, insinuating that I'm not smart enough to understand anything (I did
rank in the top 0.5% on my SAT scores, after all), or stating that a single typo
effectively invalidates my entire argument.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
| (...) The exact term you used, I think, wasn't it? (...) I don't recall ever making any such claim, I think you have me confused with someone else. However, if you can provide a cite where I said it, I'll gladly retract any statement I may have made (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
