Subject:
|
Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:59:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1230 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > That's absolute nonsense.
The exact term you used, I think, wasn't it?
> > I could say more on this topic at this time but I'm not sure it's a good use
> > of my time.
>
> If this is such a monumental waste of your time, perhaps you'd prefer to get
> back to our discussion of whether or not tritium can be harnessed as an economic
> power source?
I don't recall ever making any such claim, I think you have me confused with
someone else.
However, if you can provide a cite where I said it, I'll gladly retract any
statement I may have made in which I asserted that tritium is an economic power
source at this time.
Snipped the rest as it's baiting. That's your second try at baiting me in this
thread, too. Hence, this thread is not the best use of my time.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
| (...) Indeed it was, but you wholy missed the point in your zealous rush to criticize me yet again. I wasn't objecting to your use of my own words, but to your callous treatment of my statements by way of making a big public show of ignoring them. (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
| (...) If this is such a monumental waste of your time, perhaps you'd prefer to get back to our discussion of whether or not tritium can be harnessed as an economic power source? I seem to remember a similar response when I pointed out that we'd need (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|