Subject:
|
Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:44:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1106 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> As for your second para, do some research into how NASA, the FAA, and the OCST
> have held things back. It's not lack of desire or lack of vision in the
> commercial sector that's the problem, it's overregulation and oversubsidization.
> NASA has taken deliberate steps to make it as hard as possible for commercial
> space, and further, has done things, like destroy tooling, mandate the Shuttle
> for all cargo, and etc etc etc, over and over and over to frustrate commercial
> space endeavours.
What tooling have they destroyed?
The shuttle cargo thing was bad because of the very thing that happened: JPL
knew that any problem (as in loss of crew) meant long delays that could be
avoided by using non-crewed launch vehicles. And there was Galilleo designed to
only fit on the shuttle and ended up delayed for forever and a day.
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
| (...) All of the Saturn tooling is no more. NASA admitted they did that on purpose to "focus efforts on the shuttle". Arguably the Saturns would have been really great Big Dumb Boosters if heavy lift was something that NASA was really interested in. (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Some good news for a change, maybe?
|
| (...) You're entitled to your viewpoint, even if expressed not very politely, but I have a different view. As for your second para, do some research into how NASA, the FAA, and the OCST have held things back. It's not lack of desire or lack of (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
81 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
