| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
| |
Shareholders are often more concerned with filling their pockets than they
are with doing great things. If they weren’t, they’d donate their money
rather than investing it.
|
That’s absolute nonsense.
|
From page 112 of The Libertarian
Playbook: “Though technically not a valid rhetorical device, argument by
assertion is commonly employed when attempting to dismiss an argument by
fiat.”
| |
I could say more on this topic at this time but I’m not sure it’s a good
use of my time.
|
Also from page 112:
“One may attempt to give the technique (of argument by assertion) the
appearance of validity by affecting an air of righteous indignation, all the
while insisting either “I have proven the point already” or “I have better
ways to spend my time”
|
|
| |
Personally, I like the spurious fake-quotation that raises (shouldn’t that be
“lowers”?) sophistry to a new level. ;-)
|
I pride myself on my sophistrication.
Dave!
FUT ot.fun, because I’m having such a swell time!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
81 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
