Subject:
|
Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:48:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
486 times
|
| |
|
|
> Be that as it may, you seem to be admitting Iraq is violating the settlement
> but feel the US is wrong for attempting to enforce it? Perhaps I need for
> you to expand on this so I can understand your position better.
Let's face facts; the US has an appalling record when it comes to respecting UN
resolutions. [I see nothing that makes me think that's about to change.]
Because of that, and other issues, a lot of countries [and their populations
[even the US?]] just don't trust Bush on this. There is nothing wrong with the
US supporting the inspections – undermining them is another issue. Let the UN
reach a considered opinion with regard to Iraq. If that opinion is that SH
poses a threat and intervention is required - so be it. At that point, the UN
can give our troops some [metaphoric] blue caps and the UN's will can be
enforced within a legal framework.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
69 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
