To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18862
18861  |  18863
Subject: 
Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:49:41 GMT
Viewed: 
346 times
  
And if your answer is "more inspections" you fail. The inspection phase is
OVER. It did its job. It found evidence of material breach. Now what?

It did its job? Was its "job" to find evidence of material breach [and so allow
the war to start] or disarm iraq and avoid war?

I know what I'd like it to do.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
 
I snipped a BUSHEL of irrelevant misdirection. This is a question about 1441, not the US second amendment or anything else (...) OK, then, David. Stripped of all the other non topical stuff in your post, you concede that Iraq is in material breach (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

69 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR