Debate : 18859


Off-Topic / Debate / 18859	18858 \| 18860

Subject:	Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 6 Feb 2003 15:49:10 GMT
Viewed:	393 times

More misdirection. Herewith is a link to 1441 (one of many out there) full text. Go read it. http://australianpolitics.com/news/2002/11/02-11-08.shtml The resolution REQUESTS assistance from member states in providing info on Iraq's non compliance. It makes no statement about what happens if they decline to do so... The US has provided some info.. lots in fact. Just not such info that would, when immediately leaked, result in compromising (read, killing) sources. It DEMANDS Iraqi compliance with previous resolutions, notes that Iraq was already in material breach, and gives it one last chance to fix things up. The report is in. It's over. Iraq failed. What now, are the serious consequences? Answer the question. > It's an interesting state of affairs when I'm on the same team as Scott ;) If I were you I'd be worried about that. It's usually a sign that your reasoning or argument isn't sound. As in this case.

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
(...) Thanks for the link - I was curious as to what it actually said. Reading through it, no, we aren't in breach of it as far as I can tell, and all that we need prove is that Iraq is dragging its feet in any way. I understand many nations want (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
(...) I like to be shown that I'm wrong. It shows that I'm not so bogged down in my zeal to be right that I can actually say, "Well, I'm wrong--let's figure out what right actually is..." (...) Asked and answered--it's up to the UN to decide what (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Leaks (was Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
(...) Since rants often go on tangential tirades, well, sorry 'bout that. But I wouldn't call it 'misdirection', I'd call it 'selective reading' on the part of the US. (...) And now that Powell has conclusively proven that the US is in breach of (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

69 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search