Subject:
|
Re: Here's one of the many things I don't understand...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:12:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1293 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> > And Dubya says that his 'intelligence agencies' have 'proof' that Saddam has
> > these things that the inspectors are looking for.
>
> So-- I haven't been following overly closely-- what's the most the media
> knows about this 'proof'? As for the question at hand, I can only assume
> that Junior's intelligence knows the type of weapon but not the location. OR
> perhaps he knows where it WAS, but not where it is now. And probably has
> intelligence that disagrees with their documentation.
>
> Anyway, has it been clear what sort of 'proof' we have? Might'nt other
> countries be more on our side if they knew? Or, if they DO know, why are we
> the only ones who are so eager to go fightin'? (Rhetorical). I'd think other
> countries who knew our 'proof' and STILL weren't too worried about it would
> be encouraging the US to stop bothering already.
He can't tell anyone as:
a) We are all scared of the unknown... especially when he talks in hushed
tones........ spooky!
b) It would put the future stream of information at risk - the fact that pretty
soon the whole country will be overrun by his axis-of-war and those sources
will be worthless irrelevant!
Bush on Iraq:
They *may* have WOMD – Bomb ‘em
Bush on N Korea:
They *do* have WOMD and threaten to use them – submit to their blackmail
Bush on Pakistan:
They *do* have WOMD and threaten to use them – make ‘em an ally
Rumsfeld on Iraq:
I’m sure glad I gave SH all those WOMD, as we can now use them as an excuse to
invade!
I'm amazed at the change in opinion/tone in the group. I have noted at least
one convert to the anti-war cause who only a few months ago was ready to bomb
‘em into the stone age…. there is hope!
>
> Ah well, let's hope we beat up Saddam before the next election! Good thing
> there's a 2-term limit... We'd have to find someone else to pick on
> otherwise to get that 3rd term in!
Does Bush have a successor? His brother perhaps?
Scott A
>
> DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
69 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
