To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 13223
13222  |  13224
Subject: 
Re: Thinking Out Loud...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:17:10 GMT
Viewed: 
1000 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

But we MUST not knee jerk, as tempting as that is. This war will be a long
one, a tough one, perhaps the toughest war we have ever tried to prosecute.

So what did you mean when you said this less than 4 days after the attack?

==+==
Secretary Powell declined to specify what would
be done but said a week deadline for all of bin Laden's organization to be
turned over to the west was not unreasonable. He's being too generous.
==+==

  Sounds entirely consistent to me.   The first message expressed a desire
to have the existing powers-that-be in Afghanistan turn over bin Laden on
their own, rather than simply rolling out NATO within the week (and without
due consideration) to storm Afghanistan and take him by force.  The second
message is a caution reinforcing exactly that idea:  Eric was advised not to
pursue a course dictated by blind fury or righteous anger, but rather to
allow event to unfold along a well-planned and well-considered route.
  How do you perceive these to be inconsistent?

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Thinking Out Loud...
 
(...) In the former quote above he calls for restraint. In the latter quote above he can't wait for action. Read his latter comments in context: ==+== The aggressor has made the mistake of attacking the homeland. They will pay. If I were Saddam (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Thinking Out Loud...
 
(...) So what did you mean when you said this less than 4 days after the attack? ==+== Secretary Powell declined to specify what would be done but said a week deadline for all of bin Laden's organization to be turned over to the west was not (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

55 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR