Subject:
|
Re: Thinking Out Loud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Sep 2001 13:00:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
709 times
|
| |
|
|
"Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:GK0IsA.GL2@lugnet.com...
>
> How can you say they did not intend violence if you agree that they took
> action.
>
> The only possibility your pacifist argument has of being true is if an F-16
> actually did shoot down that jet and their has been an incredible cover-up to
> hide that fact and make the passangers into heroes. I feel I can safely say
> that most, if not all, Americans would have agreed with the decision to shoot
> down that plane given the knowledge of what the other 3 planes did, so there
> would be no need to cover it up.
>
> These people are heroes, why can't you at least give them that.
Even if the F-16 did shoot them out the sky, the passengers on board did not know that was going to happen.
I can't believe it was a cover up, as the reports that they were going to 'have a go' were coming directly from the
relatives they called.
I did read reports that the flights the terrorists chose were all unusually empty. Like one only had 30+ passengers on
a 150+ seat plane. The belief is they did this deliberately to minimise the risk of them getting attacked by the
passengers.
lawrence
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thinking Out Loud...
|
| (...) weaponless (...) You have to be kidding!!! These hijackers more than likely had killed some crew, possibly some passangers, and almost certainly the pilots. The passangers knew this. They also knew, via phone conversations, that planes were (...) (23 years ago, 21-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
55 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
