To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11150
11149  |  11151
Subject: 
Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 15:00:24 GMT
Viewed: 
1529 times
  
Scott A wrote:

> > He stated an opinion that was based on a lifetime of informal evidence
> > gathering.
> 
> Nope. From his message:
> 
> > When you
> > challenged me I went off and counted noses at that point in order to see if
> > my hunch was right.

HUNCH.  Do you know what that word means?  Obviously not.


> > He guessed
> > right!  What's your deal?
> 
> My deal is that he guessed/fabricated data and is still trying to pass it of
> as fact. I shall remind you, he has not said it was a guess/fabrication yet
> - we (you and I) are only guessing that is the case. This is what he is
> saying he did:
> 
> =+=
> When you
> challenged me I went off and counted noses at that point in order to see if
> my hunch was right. It was, at least for the 20+ fests, meetings, events,
> etc., I've attended in 6 countries on 3 continents... (a slightly better
> sample set than yours) For the subset that I reviewed pictures, each one of
> them was more male than 49% and more white than the population average for
> the continent or the country or the state that it was held in. (whichever is
> a good metric)
> =+=
> 
> That does not sound like guesswork - it sounds like a good metric. What do
> you think?

What about the word HUNCH do you not understand?

Once again, as usual, you've latched onto one word or phrase in a post and pounded
it into the ground, ignoring the entire post that makes it clear to any critical
thinker.

--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
 
(...) Tom, If it was a HUNCH, Larry needs to make it clear that it was a complete fabrication - not dress it up as fact. Read the text I quoted again - does it sound like a hunch. When Larry said he was "unwilling" to tell us all where he found the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Scott and Larry show (was: Nothing personal, but...)
 
(...) Am I wrong for saying this? Or is Larry wrong for tossing insults about? (...) Nope. From his message: (...) Is so, why is he so unwilling to admit that it was a pure fabrication? (...) I shall quote myself from my last message in this thread (...) (25 years ago, 20-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

67 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR