To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11221
11220  |  11222
Subject: 
Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:51:58 GMT
Viewed: 
739 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:

When he had a spate of treating his playmates poorly, the other
parents were bugged that I didn't make him "be nice."  But now he seems to
realize that since they stopped playing with him, there is a _real_ reason • to
be nice.  He actually learned, rather than obeyed.  I'll take that every • time.


And in the meantime everyone ELSE has to put up with your child being a brat?

If he had been so severe that I thought the other children needed their rights
protected, I would have done so.  In the instance that I'm thinking of, that
wasn't the case.  He wasn't bein egregiously abusive, he just wasn't being very
pleasant.  And I don't think that he needed to be forced into it.

You disgust me.

After all, no one forces you to be pleasant.

You're one of the people that lets their children run rampant
over everyone else,

I am?  How?  When?  Name a time that you have either witnessed or heard account
of in which that has happened.  The fact is that my single child doesn't act
like a brat except for some notable rare occasions.  I don't believe that
anyone has the right to trample on the rights of others, but up until that
point, they do have the right to conduct themselves as they see fit.

Subjecting the rest of the world to your pie-in-the-sky child
rearing techniques whether we want to hear them or not

Are you being forced to read about them, or forced to personally deal with my
child behaving in a disruptive way?  I didn't realize how great the impact of
my family was on your life.

(and letting your child run rampant with no regard for
how other people are being affected by it IS forcing your
techniques on us)

Luckily, I don't do that, so I guess your entire note is misplaced.

You obviously don't give a damn about anyone else but
yourself and your children.

Well, I certainly do care more about my son than anyone else, but part of that
is caring about his ability to deal with a society that has certain
expectations.  So I do my part to inform him of those.  But really, I think
you're just shooting off your mouth because that's one of the things you do
best.  Would you care to back these claims up with something more than wild
inference from a tossed out example in a note of mine?  Or are you happier just
making incorrect assumptions about people so that they can be neatly
pidgeonholed in your little scheme?

I can see why you're asking, you don't seem to have any clue whatsoever about • right
and wrong.  Subjecting others to the bad behavior of your children merely for • your
experimentation in child rearing is WRONG.  You obviously don't see it that
way.

What bad behavior of my son's do you mean?  Is it similarly "WRONG" when you
subject people to _your_ "bad behavior?"

Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...)
 
(...) And in the meantime everyone ELSE has to put up with your child being a brat? You disgust me. You're one of the people that lets their children run rampant over everyone else, letting them "learn", and then "discuss" it with them afterwards. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

67 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR