To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *9711 (-100)
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) On a some what interesting side note, I'd just like to know, who exactly asked Jesus to die for our sins? I mean hypothetically speaking let's say your religion is correct, Jesus died for our sins, etc, etc. I personally, feel that's wrong. I (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Ahhh but you fail to see WHY people debate the subject. Part of what faith is, is finding common ground with your fellow man. I mean when you really get down to it how many religions of 2 members or less do you know of? There is a basic (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Man in God's image
 
(...) And minifigs are created in man's image... Remember when they introduced Pirates? Peglegs, hooks and eye patches abounded. Suddenly, my Dark Ages reversed and then my LEGO began to try to kill each other like civilized people. Kind of makes me (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Custom Created Set Reference
 
(...) Hmm, an interesting topic... One could get a good inventory by noticing that John Doe happens to have brought set GOB-1234 to Brickfest and then disassemble it to count the parts. Of course how you get it back together again is another (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Jeez, Shiri... Where were you during the last debate? You could have saved us about a zillion posts! 8^) Dave! (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) <nosarcasm here, either> I think the issue is that God is an issue of *faith*. And faith alone. Maybe it's just my opinion, but if God were to be *proven*, then the idea of God would kinda... lose its power. For me at least. I do believe in (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Alien races
 
(...) But that's missing my hypothetical point; if "aliens" are also created in His image (ie: capacity for Grace/Salvation), then "man" is already filling those places and ruling them. (...) Oops. I thought I might have made that mistake. Oh, well. (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) <likewise nosarcasm> With due respect, I must point out that smarter folks than you or I have been debating this for millennia, so if it were indeed possible to prove that God must exist, it would have been done long ago to everyone's (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Alien races
 
(...) The Bible was not written in Jesus' time. Actually, it was written several hundred years later, so it should not be taken as an accurate, historical account. We know in our own times that facts are twisted within days and weeks, imagine how (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
Selçuk Göre wrote in message <3AC5BF84.F784AF2A@s...ne.com>... <stuff about god> PLEASE trim lugnet.general from your newsgroups before replying! (sheesh, how many times?) Kevin ---...--- ------ Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) Lego parts (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
Robert: (...) In this Robert is referring to me. (...) No, I'm not. I said in my post just before you said this that I ALSO AM A SINNER. I AM INHERENTLY EVIL. Only God is perfect and sinless. --Ryan (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Man in God's image
 
It's nice to hear your interest in this, Dan. I do have an answer for you, but I have to go to work now. --Ryan (...) unsettling (...) going (...) plucking. (...) our (...) or (...) created (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Alien races
 
(...) is (...) If that were the case, God also told man to fill the earth and rule it. That would mean that we have dominion over all the planets and places where aliens might reside. :) (...) I looked for this in my Bible concordance and couldn't (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
Dave Schuler: (...) Lots (...) <nosarcasm> What I meant was that I can't really prove the *existence* of God, but I can prove that God *must exist* in order for anything else to exist. But if no one wants to hear it, that's okay. Regards, --Ryan (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) But then the question could be, who is this "I" that can think? :) (not intended as any insult to you, Robert) --Ryan (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) call god as "god" but "allah" or "tanri" mostly..:-) Anyway, everybody has a right to chose his/her own spare time activity, in addition to building/playing with lego...:-) Selçuk (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Man in God's image
 
Greetings! Wow, I was following the debate on whether God has a name for God. It is certainly an intersting discussion! One thing I found unsettling is the notion of God creating man in His image. Although I consider it a noble belief, I think it is (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) If being unafraid of speaking my mind and being really open is your idea of rude, yeah, I guess I am. (...) Oh now I am certainly not doing that. If you're going to start hurling accusations just because yer ego got a little bruised I sure (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) You're setting yourself a larger task than I think is called for; the existence of God isn't predicated on the necessity of that existence. Lots of things exist without being "needed," unless we're ascribing some unguessable purpose behind (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
<snip> It is my considered opinion that he's stating that you are rude to people, deliberatly picking fights. You call it humor, but it is only funny if the other folk find it funny too. This may not be your fault, it's just one of those things (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Me?! Lie?! No, never. : ) (...) I wasn't, it was "insightfully" humorous. (...) Or so you think I think. (...) Having a load of bull is sure a lot better than being someone standing in it. (...) But you don't have to have a point to have a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Liar, liar, pants on fire... (...) Wait, you just said you weren't being sarcastic at that point. At least keep your story straight. (...) Or so you think. (...) Okay, plausible but specious form of argumentation (or, more bluntly, a load of (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) I believe we should classify her as a godess then...unless I missed a meeting on political correctness...and chances are I have. : ) Robert (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Robert, have you spent any time looking at Jennifer's TECHNIC creations? She's obviously a god. Steve (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) I did, I still don't see your point. I wasn't being sarcastic at that point you know... (...) But I like his colorful interpretation of the bible, it provided me with much humor this morning. (...) I love it when people think the ablity to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) He, he, he, relax Aaron, I was just tryin to be funny. (...) Creativity is a godlike ability? Wow, so like I'm already one step to godliness, woo hoo! (...) You didn't need to. You said brain capacity, as in the capacity of the brain, therefor (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) (URL) ya go... Bruce (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
Oops! Now I'm an ass!! Higher powers that be, forgive me for posting in .general! I'll be moving along now. Bye. AFW (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Read your comments previous to mine above. (...) Same again. If you feel you have to sneer at his website, don't bother with it. Just advice. Feel free to ignore it. (...) I think, therefore I am. Not applicable to all, I'm afraid. Or, as I (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) ILLUSTRATION. It could also mean lots of other things. (...) If people are refering to God or a godlike ability, they usually place it in caps, please don't get bent. (...) I did not use the term physical, did I. Brain capacity was intended to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Yeah but then you'd have to have one for everyone's unique interpretation and then it'd just get confusing and messy. (...) Hmmm....no I don't think I'm Catholic today...maybe tomorrow I will be though, we'll see. (...) LOL, now that's funny. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Actually, that isn't a bad idea! :-) (I mean, that there should be such a "Dummies" book) (...) If you are Catholic. (...) Divinely inspired by God. When quoting the Bible in term papers (biblical scenes being popular in many periods of art), (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Uh yeah, I think we got it, the threads are so big though that a couple offshoots got missed. Just chill d00d, I'm sure general isn't being completely overwhelmed in posts, it'll all clear up in a day or so. Robert (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Something like that happened to one of my posts. I followed up to one of Jennifer's posts but then it posted it as if the post I followed up with was the one Jennifer's replied to. A sure fire instance of Post Hoc, Ergo, Propter Hoc. Get the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Yes, that we have established, the "wobble" causes the seasons, not the other way 'round (pardon the pun), otherwise we'd have like an instance of Post Hoc, Ergo, Propter Hoc....oooOOO....now that'd make for an interesting debate. He, he, (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) GUYS! To re-iterate (albiet more rudely) what at least a couple people have said: Get this crap out of lugnet.general! James (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Hmmm...sorry about that, I snipped it earlier and assumed it stayed snipped. I'll try to keep an eye on it and snip it when I reply if I see it. Robert (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Perhaps, but is the thickness of his skin really something I should have to worry about in my day to day life? Robert (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Dare I actually post links to philosophy throughout the ages? Hmmm....perhaps some other time. Although if you'd like some insight you need go no farther than some of the lesser developed countries. Simply ask them if they think the world is (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Fair enough, but if you're going to accuse me of criticizing a view without knowing what that view is, you would be well-advised to make absolutely certain that I don't, otherwise you're just making another assumption (as if that comes as any (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
Wow! Freaky. I submitted a follow-up to Jennifer's message (evidenced by the indented history), but Lugnet's taken it as a follow-up to Robert's message prior to that. Now I'm confused. Was that intervention divine? Or just fabulous? Can we move (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Snipping out your previous texts no doubt helps you to try and pass that off. If I was actually inclined to attack you I suppose I might delve into that further, but I won't. (...) Oh so we can only debate about one thing at a time? Hmmm, it (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) I would. It's easier in the long run. :) (...) Stirring. We like stirring. (...) Personally, I think it shows a lack of imagination (not faith) to assume that everything has to be made by something or someone else. (...) Wow. If I could view (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Scott do it like this... Jude (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
Folks, Is there some compelling reason that this is still in general, after repeated plea's? This is just plain rude, and I do not want to see it. I would go to debate to see it. Please stop. FUT->off.topic.debate Scott S. -- (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
Gentlemen, (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Robert, in written language, sarcasm can be misinterpreted as personal angry attacks. That's why Dave said what he did about castigating Aaron. --Ryan (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Funny, 'cos in our environment the word 'probably' has a meaning - that there is sufficient evidence for an event to be more likely to occur than to not occur. Exactly what are you basing the use of this word on in the above context? As for (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) The "wobble" is not the cause of the seasons, rather it is the angle of the rotational axis relative to the sun during the period the earth revolves about the sun. Bruce (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) call (...) I would have to first prove the necessity of the existence of God before I could address whether the Bible is true or not...but that's a long topic that I would be happy to discuss if you want. (...) them? (...) The Word of God (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Well that's not what what's his name said, why is he wrong and why is it that you're right? Did he and I just miss some meeting or something? BTW this is your cue to say something about how the meeting was church and the head speaker was God, (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Fair enough, but if you're going to criticize a view, you would be well-advised to learn what that view is. (...) You're committing a basic falacy of reason, in that you are assuming that, since some of their views were incorrect, *all* were (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) I did not presume any such thing - the current debate concerns whether or not there is a God for God. Now, I could always have come along and said "Pah! Since God cannot be proven to exist, then this entire argument is pointless." However, It (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) When was this mythical period, precisely? Do you have a citation to share with us? (...) See the earlier million-post debate for why your statement is flatly incorrect, or at least grossly inaccurate. (...) Or a Postmodernist, if you really (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Hey whatever blows yer hair back. Interpretation is really the mother of all invention, not necessity. (...) I find South Park's ability to make certain people get upset over trivial things to be quite humorous indeed. (...) Oh gee, what was I (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) in God's image] (...) image." (...) the situation." We don't all look alike because God did not create us to look like Him, because He has no body; He is not a *physical* being, but a *spiritual* being. John 4:24 says, "God is spirit, and (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
I have replied to some of Robert's questions. The message can be found in off-topic.debate, as per some requests. --Ryan (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) You too! And here I though I was alone in the world. : ) (...) And why did you presume that they were correct beyond a shadow of a doubt in their thinking? I once read a study by numerous "experts" who said that it takes your stomach ten (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) More specifically, I have understood it to mean that man has the capacity for Grace, and in this way we are created in His image. (...) Well, if you thought South Park was humorous, then you have issues that won't be resolved in this forum. (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Do you have any idea how hilarious this statement is? God created us in his image, so we created other gods in our image? Perhaps it was really the other way around. :) Anyway, be careful how far you go next time you're on a ship. You might (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Straight Roundness (was Re: Does God have a name for God?)
 
(...) I'd much rather ponder what a "straight circle" is. A gyroscope undergoes precession, in that its axis of rotation "wobbles," but the rotation itself, relative to that axis, is pretty fixed, I think. Dave! (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) I disagree. I've asked a similar question in the course that I teach (non-majors intro to biology). My question was along the lines of 'What does the environment do for us?' I've had students give answers that range from 'nothing' to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Of course I am. The little green men communicate with me via my fillings and tell me so. They send me detailed plans for my Technic models. (...) Because this is what people who do believe and study those religions have told me - I am (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) And here I thought those things on yer head were for the convenience of always having a place to hang up your coat. Boy do I feel silly! : ) Robert (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Not to get off topic...oh wait we already are, never mind. Does the world actually turn around in a straight circle? I mean I know it sorta wobbles and what not and that's how we get the seasons, but is it how the earth is rotating that is (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) Wow. Bush continues to suprise me in how easily he can lower my opinion of him. Jeff (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) I have at least one of those three thing. I'm not saying which. ;-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) If I knew Latin I would sure have a lot of time on my hands... (...) So do you know this for a fact because you are a God, or are you in direct contact with some higher source of power? (...) Then why presume to make assumptions about what it (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Weren't the Overseer's something from that book...um...Childhood's End I believe. In which case they would have overly large bodies, small wings, and horns. All in all I guess they'd have devilishly good looks. ^*_*^ Robert (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Generally speaking one shouldn't try to generalize a topic into a general category, and in general terms any four star general would generally know the general posting netiquite...or perhaps not. : ) (...) Oh goody, goody, can we debate (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) That's okay, most people have trouble understanding me correctly, call it a curse if you will. (...) Why is someone forcing you to believe something? I find that hard to believe. : ) People believe what they need to believe, but at the root of (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) And the world turns round again... (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Perhaps we are it? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) If I knew the Latin for "who guards the guards?", I could sound really pretentious here, but unfortunately I don't, therefore I shall have to sound pretentious without the benefit of a dead language. However, the point is already made; God (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
To All, While this maybe a fascinating debate, please keep it out of lugnet.general. I don't know why it is here in the first place. FUT->off.topic.debate Sincerely, Scott S. -- Personal Page: (URL) Index Page: (URL) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) I don't know if I understand you correctly: Do you mean that people need to force up their beliefs to other people otherwise their belief have no meaning? -Frank (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Um...surely you realize the futility in arguing this? I mean people NEED to believe what they believe, that is why they believe it. If we ever do encounter an alien race, I hope they're advanced enough to comprehend that simple concept, (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Keeping things in perspective
 
(...) I think this tends to bring up the differences in Lego enthusiasts. I myself consider building with Legos to be a form of art, it is a way to express myself. For others it's something to collect, a hobby to keep oneself busy, to have a sense (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Uh yeah, sure, that works too, we can allow that. (...) So then it's true the handicapped (those missing various extremities anyway) go to hell. And here I thought South Park was just being humorous. (...) Does this mean we have to start (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Sounds like an offtopic.debate thing to me... (...) Heh, interesting website because all 'truths' are quoted from a man-made book and blindy claims that the book tells the truth. I have never learned to take the texts written in the Bible this (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) Oops. That should be 0.4-1.2 increase in CO2 - that results in a 3-7% rise in yearly rainfall. Scott A (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) The consensus view is that it is. I’m sure the oil companies have a few scientists or academics who can show otherwise. But, I also hear that there are academics how feel the whole concept evolution is bunkum. ;-) (...) ~5% increase in (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) I'm only going in on this one part here. It is my belief that man in God's image is not exactly literal, but of broader meaning Biblically. Image can mean form (arms, legs, head, torso) or function. My opinion of God is that He (not gender, (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) Long term. Unfortunately, most corporations, and (maybe more importantly) most governments only think short term. ROSCO (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Keeping things in perspective
 
(...) Strong resonances with me. The hobby (like all hobbies?) lends itself to addictive behaviour. At least it's not physically addictive, although maybe the FOTW rush is a bit of a worry. Perhaps it's also the dissociation from reality that can (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) Probably. Apologies for the glib answers here -- I'm more interested in the logic behind them. (...) Worst case scenario -- global catastrophe. Even if Greenhouse _itself_ isn't catastrophic, it might be in combination with other ecological (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) As soon as the discussion loses its LEGO nature, go to off-topic I think. (...) Or at least the three main narrative threads in the Pentateuch have three different names for God, that reflect different understandings of God. Does rendering the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Well of course God existed first, that truth is tattooed on our arms at birth. That is after all how we know absolutely for certain. (...) If that were true why don't we all look alike? (...) If God is really a God why is it that he can only (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) looks (...) God, (...) But thats *human* religions!! What if God has It's own religion? What does It call Its Grand Overseer?? ROSCO (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) That's the wrong question, because it begs the answer. I would suggest that a different line of questioning may be more fruitful. - Is the specific problem that Kyoto purports to solve really a problem? If so, how bad? If we're not sure, what (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Keeping things in perspective
 
(...) You bring up some very good points that are pertinent to some Lego/Life things that I've been musing on. I may be alone in this, but I do sometimes feel that the bricks own me...I just *have* to get such and such a set to top off my (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
 
(...) What is the singular of Legos then? ;-) Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
 
(...) Gah! My mistake, wrong James! We've achieved critical James-mass, just like we exceeded the Eric limit! Dave! (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
 
(...) I thought you wrote that there was no such thing as "a LEGO," unless you're indicating that the company's half-life is 2.5B. 8^) Dave! (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Offtopic .. outgassing
 
(...) 2.5 billion years. james (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) "There is no god but Allah." Same God, by the way. Anyway, the question is whether God has a name for God, not whether we have a name for God. I suppose if God invented Aramaic or Arabic, that could be debated (scratching head and pondering (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
 
(...) Yes, you could say either of those things, but they wouldn't be accurate (except insofar as 'Lego' is a noun in the vernacular(1)). There is no product called "LEGO". To collect LEGO, you would have to start buying companies. I don't think (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
 
(...) I am not sure I agree. Kyoto provided a framework for the worlds biggest polluters to reduce their polluting output. If you think it is not as good as it could be as it focuses on 40 or so industrialised economies - but ignores the developing (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
 
(...) Beware the JubJub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch... Though in this case, like the Snark, the Bandersnatch turned out to be a Boojum. There's a Carrollian logic buried in there somewhere. :-) Bruce (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Does God have a name for God?
 
(...) Regardless, I see your site refers to "Virtual Legos," so you've apparently got a vested interest in both parts of this thread! 8^) Dave! (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 100 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR