Subject:
|
Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:47:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
315 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Low writes:
>
> 1. It is a problem, we try to fix it.
> 2. It is a problem, we do nothing.
> 3. It isn't a problem, we try to fix the non-problem.
> 4. It isn't a problem, we do nothing.
>
> 1. Cross fingers, pat selves on back.
> 2. Cross fingers really tight, die.
> 3. Polluting energy abandoned for cleaner energy. Some companies lose, some
> gain. Environment less polluted.
> 4. Great.
>
> The costs of 2. are so much higher than of 3.,
Long term. Unfortunately, most corporations, and (maybe more importantly) most
governments only think short term.
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
| (...) Probably. Apologies for the glib answers here -- I'm more interested in the logic behind them. (...) Worst case scenario -- global catastrophe. Even if Greenhouse _itself_ isn't catastrophic, it might be in combination with other ecological (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
