Subject:
|
Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:19:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
209 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> Quick Poll - Kyoto
>
> What is the feeling in the US/elsewhere regarding W's back tracking on
> Kyoto? The line taken by the "green" lobby in the UK is that he is not brave
> enough to shoulder the economics of the situation. Is it as simple as that?
Simpler.
Kyoto is a bad idea. The one who wasn't brave was Clinton for not saying so.
And I'll happily take my lumps from greens for that view.
> A UK media report can be read here:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1248000/1248278.stm
>
> Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
| (...) I am not sure I agree. Kyoto provided a framework for the worlds biggest polluters to reduce their polluting output. If you think it is not as good as it could be as it focuses on 40 or so industrialised economies - but ignores the developing (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
| Quick Poll - Kyoto What is the feeling in the US/elsewhere regarding W's back tracking on Kyoto? The line taken by the "green" lobby in the UK is that he is not brave enough to shoulder the economics of the situation. Is it as simple as that? A UK (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
