Debate : 9671


Off-Topic / Debate / 9671	9670 \| 9672

Subject:	Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:19:04 GMT
Viewed:	2916 times

Wow! Freaky. I submitted a follow-up to Jennifer's message (evidenced by the indented history), but Lugnet's taken it as a follow-up to Robert's message prior to that. Now I'm confused. Was that intervention divine? Or just fabulous? Can we move this to lugnet.off-topic.fun anyway? I know I'm not taking it seriously. Jason J Railton

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
(...) Something like that happened to one of my posts. I followed up to one of Jennifer's posts but then it posted it as if the post I followed up with was the one Jennifer's replied to. A sure fire instance of Post Hoc, Ergo, Propter Hoc. Get the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
(...) I would. It's easier in the long run. :) (...) Stirring. We like stirring. (...) Personally, I think it shows a lack of imagination (not faith) to assume that everything has to be made by something or someone else. (...) Wow. If I could view (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

137 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search