Subject:
|
Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:53:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
534 times
|
| |
| |
"John Heins" <Johnmhiii@aol.com> wrote in message news:Grv2G6.zH@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.technic, Jennifer Clark writes:
[snippage]
> As stated before, just TRY to mount ANYTHING constructed out of new style
> Technic pieces onto a base plate without using old style holed beams to
> interface between the two. Without holed studded beams (even as small as
> 1x2) there is NO compatability between the current Technic line and bricks.
Not to beat this to death, but this is plainly false.
Here are some ways to connect non-studded technic parts to studded parts.
- simply stick the beam to a studded part using the holes in the beam
- 1x2 plate with female technic connector(s) underneath
- 1x2, 2x2, 2x4 brick with technic peg(s)
- 1x2 plate with peg (on bottom or top)
- 2x4 plate with pegs (may come in other sizes as well)
- angle brick, bushing, axle extender (et al) snapped vertically between
4 studs
- click hinge with female technic connector
- 1L peg with stud (there are hundreds of ways using this part alone)
- 3L technic axle with stud
- Alpha Team underwater windscreen (these are incredibly cool parts for
use with technic)
- Jack Stone chassis (beams, true, but not traditional ones)
- "Dinosaurs" abdomen, legs, appendages
- sandwich the beam between two plates (this gives you a way to
create a sliding motion without using tiles)
As an exercise, I recommend you try recreating a classic Technic model,
or a close likeness thereof, without using studded beams. It can be a
very satisfying way to learn how to manipulate the new parts.
Cheers, Mark K
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
73 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|