Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:07:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2612 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:36:25PM +0000, Jennifer L. Boger wrote:
> Quoting Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com>:
> > I think it's time to call the question. What level of validation do you
> > (and
> > Jenn, for that matter, since she voiced a negative with no positive
> > offered)
> > think we need? What scheme do you propose we use? Can you get something
> > concrete on the table to replace (or, alternatively, you could speak up in
> > support of) the straw man.
>
> I don't see a problem with email validation until it becomes a problem, myself.
that would work with me, if everyone accepts the risk.
> Alternatively, we could require a LUGNET membership number unless anyone
> disagrees with that idea, so far I've heard no objections - if there are, we can
> certainly rethink the idea.
I wouldn't want to require LDraw members to be LUGNET members.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| Quoting Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com>: (...) I don't see a problem with email validation until it becomes a problem, myself. Alternatively, we could require a LUGNET membership number unless anyone disagrees with that idea, so far I've (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
