Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:15:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1607 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> But how do we ensure uniqueness? emails are easy to come by. We don't want
> people stuffing ballots. It was bad enough when it happened in MOTM voting
> but when we're talking about the LSC membership, approving charters, voting
> on the StC (ldraw.org steering committee) membership and so forth, ballot
> stuffing is, in my view, much more serious of a problem.
We've seen quite a few good (and some overboard) suggestions in this thread
so far. Lar, you wrote in another message:
> We need to find the right balance that most people won't squawk about, along
> with an acknowledgement of an acceptable level of privacy, and get consensus
> that it's the right balance.
Yep. I think the right question to ask here is:
Would you rather be absolutely sure everyone who votes is unique, which
could lower participation, -OR- would you rather have this open to more
participants with the risk of spoofing votes?
I'm not sure how I feel about which end of the spectrum to lean towards. I
want to encourage initial participation, but once an org gets rolling (not
sure what stage to consider that), it would be good to have more
verification. Of course, that's a bridge to cross when we get there.
Does anyone else have thoughts? Let's try to draw this closer to a conclusion...
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
74 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
