Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:32:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1911 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky writes:
>
> > I think Lugnet number requirement is a good start.
>
> OK, would that be sufficient? Only LUGNET(tm) members can be members? Is
> that too exclusionary? It's certainly simple enough.
>
> If it IS too exclusionary, what scheme would you suggest for those potential
> members who are not LUGNET members?
Just to get people thinking, since maybe we're stuck... try this strawman
To be an ldraw.org member, you have to supply 3 things, all of which are
retained in a DB for validation (but not made public)
1. your real name
2. a working email address
3. and any one of the following
- a LUGNET member number (which will be checked for uniqueness in the db)
- a FBTB userid (which will be checked as above)
- a BrickLink userid (as above)
- a BZPower userid (as above)
- N current members who will vouch for you that you are a real person
(N=3 perhaps?)
- mail in something that establishes you are a real person. Perhaps mail
in the letter that ldraw.org mails YOU? It gets shredded on return to ldraw.org
(that last one would be used only for extreme cases as one of the above
would suit everyone, just about)
How would that be? Who would be disenfranchised by that set? Or is even that
set too tough? Should we just allow more or less anyone to vote, ala MoTM?
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Lemme see... 1) Amy Hughes 2) lugnews@IXNAYONTHEAM...hughes.org 3) lugnet # 928 and 1) Nancy Drew 2) ndrew@NYETSPAMthelor...houses.com (yep, that's me) 3) gimme a week or so to create and use an FBTB account and 1) Fred Smith 2) (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) This last suggestion sounds like having a membership packet. I like the idea of having a membership package, possibly packaged with a CD of current LDraw editors, tools, library, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) I think the letter idea is the best one yet. I was going to post something like this last night, but you beat me to it. :P It's analogous to Lugnet's membership packet, but less intensive to administer. Even a post card with a unique text (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) The above set sounds OK to me. (...) I think you've found a good balance by the set above. Todd has mentioned a system for cross-checking IDs for uniqueness elsewhere in this thread, which I think is important to be able to claim an off-site (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, would that be sufficient? Only LUGNET(tm) members can be members? Is that too exclusionary? It's certainly simple enough. If it IS too exclusionary, what scheme would you suggest for those potential members who are not LUGNET members? (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
