Subject:
|
Who can vote for the LSC? (was: Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:03:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1631 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > The definition of who's a member of ldraw.org and thus, eligible to vote on
> > LSC membership, on the other hand, might.
>
> just a few thoughts:
>
> * the LSC is a technical body
> * the new file format worked out by the LSC will effect the work of
> part-authors and programmers.
>
> conclusion:
>
> * honestly I can't see a reason why people who have never authored a part or
> wrote code for a ldraw prog should interfer with a technical issue which
> will probably change deeply the way of authoring parts or writing progs.
> * the election of the LSC (I'm not talking about LDraw.org) should be
> restricted to people registered as reviewers or authors at the PT and the
> bunch of code-gods. (I'll leave the details to you of how many parts a voter
> must have submitted or reviewed, how many workin' code a programmer must
> have written ;-)
I pretty much agree with you. I'm not 100% sure if the latest draft proposal
explicitly states this or not. My original thought was along these lines as
well.
An observation, if I may... I've spent quite some time talking about this
LSC concept, starting a while before the first LUGNET thread...
1. first with a couple people individually
2. with some people as a group
3. the first (very large) LSC thread on LUGNET
4. with a few individuals as a group (drafting proposal)
5. Posted proposal draft on LUGNET
So I've put a lot of thought into this. Do I get a vote? Under the criteria
in the proposal, I don't qualify. I've got a good idea based on the
programmers I've talked to who I'd like to see on there, and I'd like to
have a part in that decision. I do however understand (and agree with) your
concern as stated above.
> * authors and reviewers are already registered at the PT, the code-gods well
> known. may be the date the server crashed could work as a dead-line.
Or we can set a near-future cutoff date when I post draft 0.99 (which I see
no reason I can't post it once this is resolved, since there's been no more
discussion/concerns aired)
> * let's vote! (in the meantime you have all the time to think about a secure
> way of holding on-line elections).
We're not quite as far on general concensus regarding voting as we are on
the LSC proposal. Almost, but not quite. :-) When we get there, we'll see
this all get put into motion.
That said, despite some wrangling, I'm very pleased with the direction these
discussions have been taking.
Thanks, Willy!
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) just a few thoughts: * the LSC is a technical body * the new file format worked out by the LSC will effect the work of part-authors and programmers. conclusion: * honestly I can't see a reason why people who have never authored a part or wrote (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
