Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:21:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1717 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 04:15:56PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> Would you rather be absolutely sure everyone who votes is unique, which
> could lower participation, -OR- would you rather have this open to more
> participants with the risk of spoofing votes?
I think easily spoofed votes are unacceptable. Especially in the
initial phase of the org, when we're electing the board.
> I'm not sure how I feel about which end of the spectrum to lean towards. I
> want to encourage initial participation, but once an org gets rolling (not
> sure what stage to consider that), it would be good to have more
> verification. Of course, that's a bridge to cross when we get there.
I'd say first get the org running, and then worry about encouraging more
participation.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Ok. (...) I can accept this. There are several possible verification systems. I think we should use several, to make it easy for as many people as possible. Ultimately though, the onus should be on the applicant to prove his/her identity, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) We've seen quite a few good (and some overboard) suggestions in this thread so far. Lar, you wrote in another message: (...) Yep. I think the right question to ask here is: Would you rather be absolutely sure everyone who votes is unique, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
