Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:29:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1907 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Orion Pobursky writes:
> I think Lugnet number requirement is a good start.
OK, would that be sufficient? Only LUGNET(tm) members can be members? Is
that too exclusionary? It's certainly simple enough.
If it IS too exclusionary, what scheme would you suggest for those potential
members who are not LUGNET members?
> Once we get going we
> could establish something similar, like a LDraw.org number.
Not sure what you mean there. A number is an evidence of membership, it
doesn't solve the verification problem (at whatever verification level you
choose to put in place, if any...), it's something that you could put in
place after.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Just to get people thinking, since maybe we're stuck... try this strawman To be an ldraw.org member, you have to supply 3 things, all of which are retained in a DB for validation (but not made public) 1. your real name 2. a working email (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) I completely agree with Jennifer. As I stated before, we're not running State elections we're voting for a hobby organization. The problem about false votes has been blown way out a proportion. It may be a problem if we had 1000's of people (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
