Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:00:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1610 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:54:33PM +0000, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Don't forget we don't need just ONE scheme. There can be several, and you
> use the scheme you are most comfortable with as a prospective member.
nod, good point.
> For instance: (just a thought starter)
>
> Could piggyback off something else... have a complex scheme that involves
> mailing in things to somewhere to validate who you are or something OR you
> give your LUGNET member number and avoid the scheme, because you already are
> valid that way?
well, while I do trust the Lugnet auth to insure that you can't post as
me, I don't see how it verifies that I'm a real person, as opposed to a
part of Jennifer's imagination...
> Assuming LUGNET antispoofing is sufficiently robust for us... it is, ne?
I'm not as worried about people spoofing other people's votes, as much
as I am about people registering themselves multiple times. And that's
the part I can't seem to solve.
We could try to do some sort of web-of-trust, similar to the (mostly
failed) PGP idea. Members are people who other members actually
know/met. But that precludes the lone cadder in the heights of the
Himalayas from becoming a member - which would be sad.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Don't forget we don't need just ONE scheme. There can be several, and you use the scheme you are most comfortable with as a prospective member. For instance: (just a thought starter) Could piggyback off something else... have a complex scheme (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
