Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:08:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2270 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jennifer L. Boger writes:
> Quoting Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com>:
>
> > But more importantly, until we've a consensus on what level of validation
> > is
> > appropriate, I'd rather we just brainstormed about different validation
> > mechanisms and their pros and cons, without committing that any particular
> > one be used or, conversely, ruling it out... saying "ABSOLUTELY OPPOSE" in
> > all caps isn't quite in the spirit of brainstorming, in my view.
>
> I wasn't brainstorming. I was expressing my opinion. I was expressing it as
> strongly as I thought was appropriate given how strongly I felt about it. I
> am not only concerned with myself about this issue, I don't think that ldraw
> needs *anyones* personal information off of a utility bill, ID card, bank
> statement or what have you. I also don't think that we'd be able to read
> 1/2 of them as they'd be in a different language.
I completely agree with Jennifer. As I stated before, we're not running
State elections we're voting for a hobby organization. The problem about
false votes has been blown way out a proportion. It may be a problem if we
had 1000's of people voting to affect the lives of 10000's but this is not
the case. I state again, this is a hobby.
I think Lugnet number requirement is a good start. Once we get going we
could establish something similar, like a LDraw.org number.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, would that be sufficient? Only LUGNET(tm) members can be members? Is that too exclusionary? It's certainly simple enough. If it IS too exclusionary, what scheme would you suggest for those potential members who are not LUGNET members? (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| Quoting Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com>: (...) I wasn't brainstorming. I was expressing my opinion. I was expressing it as strongly as I thought was appropriate given how strongly I felt about it. I am not only concerned with myself about (...) (22 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
