Subject:
|
Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:41:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2423 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
> Everyone: Can we move forward based on this list above? I haven't seen any
> serious objections, so I don't see why not. (if there are some and I missed
> them, please point them out).
look at Amy's post, and what she pointed out.
For making sure each member is unique, the list (that I snipped) doesn't
help. But I suggest we move on anyway, and just require a unique
working email address for now. We can try to think of other ideas later
on - I do not think we _have_ to solve this before starting the whole
membership process.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) The above set sounds OK to me. (...) I think you've found a good balance by the set above. Todd has mentioned a system for cross-checking IDs for uniqueness elsewhere in this thread, which I think is important to be able to claim an off-site (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
74 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
