Subject:
|
Re: Stick in the mud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 11 Jun 2000 13:06:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1258 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> > I don't think that Lego would appreciate such a change. It wasn't their
> > intention.
>
> .. and, if true, why do you think that would be?
Perhaps because official sponsership or endorsement would cause more headaches
than the occasional no-strings-attached gift.
LEGO as a company do it all the time - they might send out a K8 to a LEGOfest,
organise local events; they have a history of supporting the LEGO community.
Albeit usually in a low-publicity fashion that most of us never hear about.
Support does not imply Endorsement or Sponsership.
Endorsement or Sponsership does imply Support.
Can we agree that LEGO may occasionally Support LUGNET (as mentioned on the
front page), and that this doesn't constitute Endorsement or Sponsership (also
mentioned clearly on the front page). Then we can salute the front page, and
forget this rather dreary thread?
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes: <snipped well said reply/explanation> (...) A capital idea, would that it only would take hold. I for one am baffled why this thread has went on so long on such a tiny point that seems so stunningly (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
