Subject:
|
Re: Stick in the mud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:02:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1435 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > which helps deter sloppy (i.e. wrong) URLs from being propagated.
>
> You're technically correct. Leaving off a trailing slash is technically
> "wrong" syntax. But before we condemn servers for automatically adding it
> back in and doing what the user expects without a lecture to the user on
> "proper" URL syntax, let's please remember why computers were invented and
> who is supposed to be in charge during the user-computer experience.
>
> One hint, it's not the computer. And it's not the system administrator
> either, at least not to the extent of dictating how the user should
> interact.
>
> Having said that, I think what you propose as a way to catch omitted
> slashes seems reasonable.
I'm of two minds on this. :)
It's not so bad when a server adds a trailing slash when someone types a URL
in wrong by hand (like something they saw printed wrong on purpose in a print
advertisement), but when a server allows _written_ URLs (i.e., from links at
other pages) to be wrong, therein lies the can of worms. Hmm, a server could
certainly look at the HTTP referrer on-the-fly and decide how lenient to be
based on the origin of the URL.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) You're technically correct. Leaving off a trailing slash is technically "wrong" syntax. But before we condemn servers for automatically adding it back in and doing what the user expects (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
