Subject:
|
Re: Stick in the mud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:23:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
868 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > OK. Let us be 100% clear on this, are you saying that by gifting you this
> > > money & by posting here, Brad/TLG is _not_ showing that he supports and
> > > approves of what you are doing
That is really a question for Brad.
> > > - and in a small way is _not_ encouraging you to keep up the good work.
True encouragement comes only from within.
> > > By giving the money, assuming you have accepted it, LUGNET is now _not_
> > > supported (I do not mean just financially), albeit in a small way, by
> > > LEGO?
Brad Justus made "on behalf of The LEGO Company" a financial donation to
LUGNET. Since I am not psychic, I cannot know whether it is the first or
the last, but I must assume that it is the only. I certainly would _not_
say that LUGNET "is supported" by LEGO. However, I _would_ say that an
employee of LEGO made a financial donation to LUGNET.
> > LUGNET is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The LEGO Company.
>
> Todd, with respect, I do not think you have answered my question?
> How are you defining "sponsored" & "endorsed"?
Off the top of my head: to sponsor something is to provide significant
financial support and/or responsibility for it (by "significant" I mean a
significant percentage); to endorse something is to make an explicit public
statement of support of it. It would take a written statement of endorsement
from the CEO of LEGO or a member of the executive team before I would even
consider taking such a statement seriously.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| This thread is a total waste of time, but I like a good nitpick as much as the next guy so I need to do a tangential 'pick... (...) Hrm... unless Brad made the donation from his personal funds, this last sentence is probably not accurate. Since (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) Inferring form is actions, I, personally, _assume_ he does. (...) LP summed up, more or less, my thoughts on this. (...) Here lies my problem. I could pick up my dictionary, and come away with a different meanings. If you want to be clear, and (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|