Subject:
|
Re: Stick in the mud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 11 Jun 2000 12:37:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
907 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Scott A <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Here lies my problem. I could pick up my dictionary, and come away with a
> > different meanings. If you want to be clear, and I assume you do, you should
> > perhaps think about making a change to the phraseology.
>
> I don't think that Lego would appreciate such a change. It wasn't their
> intention.
... and, if true, why do you think that would be?
Scott A
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
> Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
> Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) Perhaps because official sponsership or endorsement would cause more headaches than the occasional no-strings-attached gift. LEGO as a company do it all the time - they might send out a K8 to a LEGOfest, organise local events; they have a (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) Well, I think I said -- and I think it's obvious. They don't want any of the legal responsibilities that would come with an endorsement/sponsorship relationship. (24 years ago, 11-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
