Subject:
|
Re: Stick in the mud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Jun 2000 17:47:42 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.spamlessORG
|
Viewed:
|
607 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott A <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote:
> What is the difference between the legal definition of these words & the
> standard one? Educate me.
As I hope we all know, I'm not a lawyer. But:
Sponsorship/endorsement constitutes a special sort of relationship which
implies a level of responsibility. If Lego sponsored LUGnet in this sense,
they could be legally responsible for what goes on here. Giving (or
receiving) a gift doesn't necessarily imply or result in this level of
relationship.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) There is some common ground between us, the fact that a gift does not "necessarily" imply what I said it could, means that the text is not 100% clear. Do you agree? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
