Subject:
|
Re: Stick in the mud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:07:09 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
{mattdm@mattdm.}ihatespam{org}
|
Viewed:
|
783 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott A <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote:
> There is some common ground between us, the fact that a gift does not
> "necessarily" imply what I said it could, means that the text is not 100%
> clear. Do you agree?
Both Lego and LUGnet claim that it does not. This resolves any uncertainty.
If there were no disclaimer, there might be some question. However, the
statements of both parties remove that completely.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) Lego and LUGNET agree that there is no implied or actual support or sponsorship. That's pretty clear, right? Or is Scott claiming that one or both parties are not being truthful? I can't see much reason for continuing this silliness... (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) There is some common ground between us, the fact that a gift does not "necessarily" imply what I said it could, means that the text is not 100% clear. Do you agree? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
