Subject:
|
Re: Stick in the mud...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:20:12 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org{StopSpammers}
|
Viewed:
|
1188 times
|
| |
|
|
Kevin Loch <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote:
> What filesystem allows file bar and directory bar in the foo directory?
Yeah, I've been wondering this too. It's pretty longstanding practice in
unix that "ls /usr" and "ls /usr/" are going to get me exactly the same
thing.
For that matter, "stat /usr" and "stat /usr/" both get me the same thing....
And I'm relatively certain that the situation is the same in DOS/Windows...
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) More specifically try to create a file and a directory with the same parent and same name. It doesn't work on any operating system I know of (ok I haven't tried it on a Mac). KL (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Stick in the mud...
|
| (...) What filesystem allows file bar and directory bar in the foo directory? The only way to utilize the above hypothetical URL's is to use mod-rewrite (or similar). You could easially disable slash-optional rewrite when a mod-rewrite rule is (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jun-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
