Subject:
|
Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:33:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2606 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
<snip>
> I'm done being adversarial on this point, as I would encourage everyone
> else to do. Mid afternoon on Friday the dialog went dead. I was not sure if
> this was a good sign or bad. It in fact, was a very good sign.
<snip>
> In many ways, this particular case was good for lugnet, in that the rules,
> procuedures and their applications are being reviewed and updated. I trust
> that the Admin team is working very hard at looking at all sides, and trying
> to look at the whole picture, as indicated by Todd's posts.
<snip>
I'm with Kevin on this--the points have been made and now lie in the purview of
the admins. Rehashing the ground will just cause added consteration for parties
involved, as well as for all of LUGNET.
Unless there's anything new to add, eh, let's play with LEGO bricks :)
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
| (...) Hi Ben, I have been in email contact with the Admin team, and *know* that this and many other points raised in this thread have been noted, as indicated by a few of Todd's post. Noted is a serious understatement, but I cannot come up with (...) (16 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
