Subject:
|
Re: Suspend me as well (was Susp. of Chris and Terry)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:25:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2696 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
| |
| |
only because I think it is detrimental to
punish any one that did not break any stated rules.
|
Here we get to un-easy ground. Who has broken rules and who has not is up
for grabs - it is the Admin’s job to make that determination, and we have.
I don’t believe that we need to justify our decisions to anyone except other
Admins.
|
And yet isn’t that exactly what you have been trying to do these past few
days?
|
I’ve been trying to help everyone understand. But you’re right - I shouldn’t
have been doing that. I made the decision, with other Admins, and I am
comfortable with it. As I have stated several times, I believe Chris broke the
ToU, and whether you agree with me is immaterial.
Thank you for your input, it has been duly note.
-Lenny Hoffman
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
