Subject:
|
Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:57:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1128 times
|
| |
|
|
I see nothing wrong with considering this. However, I do wonder how many people
would be willing to stand for election? I also expect Todd would want to retain
the right to veto any proposed admin.
Scott A
In lugnet.admin.general, Benjamin Medinets wrote:
| |
that bucket o’ bolts...
| |
I really don’t think dragging contemporary politics into this discussion is
going to be very productive.
Actually, LUGNET is supposed to be an oligarchy (for a while at least) - see
Todd’s post “Taking LUGNET to the
next level” from February 2004:
I want to take LUGNET through a two-part transition, essentially
metamorphising it first from a monarchy into an oligarchy, and then from
an oligarchy into the analagous online form of a representational
democracy or a constitutional republic.
Perhaps the time has come to make the admins more accountable. I think
having elected admins would cut down on a lot of the frustration some of us
are feeling. The answer to the question “What do we do about a bad admin?”
would be “Vote him out next election!”
Marc Nelson Jr.
|
Wow!! The first bit of reasonable logic I heard here in a while.
Nice suggestions Marc. I just hope that Todd reads it, because this is
the system that Lugnet needs to try to transition to, without it becoming
too much of a popularity contest.
Ben Medinets
|
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
| that bucket o' bolts... (...) Wow!! The first bit of reasonable logic I heard here in a while. Nice suggestions Marc. I just hope that Todd reads it, because this is the system that Lugnet needs to try to transition to, without it becoming too much (...) (16 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
