Subject:
|
Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:09:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1423 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
| |
I object. Chris withdrew is contest out of respect for lugnet.
|
Not entirely true. Chris withdrew his contest out of respect for Todd - which shows that Chris does
not respect Todd’s choices in who Todd has elevated to Admin status.
|
Is it required?
| |
| |
I do think there are problems with the rules and their administration by
some of the admins. I believe that both are workable while reenstating the
respectful tone that we all used to use.
Was this a group vote? Was it unanimous?
|
It followed the established process for suspensions. An Admin proposed the
suspension with a given amount of time (in this case, indefinite) and another
Admin concurred. In the interest of speed, no formal vote was taken.
|
Then I object again.
| |
The Admins have been discussing this entire thread during these past few
days.
| |
What was the point of asking Chris to remove his contest when you already
planned to kick him out?
|
We did not kick him out (which would be called ‘banning’), we suspended him
indefinately. The difference is this: I hope that Chris will return at
some future moment in time. The terms of what it will take to allow Chris to
return have not been discussed at this moment in time.
| |
I respectfully object to this action. If sanctions are going to be handed
down then let them be handed down to all parties. This issue is *not* one
sided.
|
Thank you for the note of your objection.
Suspensions will not be made on a “all parties” basis - each individual is
responce for maintaining an air of civility and respectfulness to all other
individuals. There is nothing that removes this obligation from the
individual.
Chris was not suspended for his actions in a particular ‘issue’ - but for a
gross and unacceptable insult to a fellow Lugnet member.
|
And yet, Admins can insult and berate sarcastically and have no warnings or
admonishment of any kind?
| |
-Lenny Hoffman
Lugnet Admin
Member #1168
|
Kevin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
| (...) It is required that all other members be respected. Those who have volunteered to give their time and efforts to the better good, especially. On a more legalistic note, posts by Admins as Admins (using the @lugnet address) should be considered (...) (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
| (...) Not entirely true. Chris (URL) his contest out of respect for Todd - which shows that Chris does not respect Todd's choices in who Todd has elevated to Admin status. (...) It followed the established process for suspensions. An Admin proposed (...) (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
