To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / *13046 (-100)
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Even with the code, specially if all is in PERL, it's till a daunting task to maintain it all. There's (unfortunately IMHO) a reason pretty much every website under the moon these days uses some "cheap" CMS system with a simple webboard (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Suzanne, after reading your website comments, I can see the strain that this has had on your personal life. Now for the tough question.... is Todd willing to give up the code to Lugnet? If so, then there may be hope for the future of Lugnet. I (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Kelly I really appreciate your words, especially those in this last paragraph that echos the way many of us feel. My fear is also that no other site can pick up the slack, at least not in a timely enough situation, as you mentioned. The more (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Suz, Thanks for clarifying that. I wasn't actually having an issue with what you are doing or why (and in many ways I'm in the same type of situation you are), but more with Scott's assertion that LUGNET is better off because Larry, Frank, (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Okay, I called my doctor and was able to postpone 'till 3:30 because someone else canceled. That means I have to leave in about 90 minutes. -Suz (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Kelly, I hear you, but this is wrong. I must take a moment to correct your assumption: If I had to point to one reason over all others as to why I'm doing this right now, it's because of my husband and our relationship being in jeopardy over (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNet shut off
 
I'd hate to see Lugnet go myself, though I'd be lying if I said that I don't somewhat miss the good ol' days of rec.toys.lego. -Josh (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNet shut off
 
(...) Wait a minute. There's only room for one Orion on LUGNET :-b (Just Kidding) - (The Real) Orion (21 years ago, 17-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNet shut off
 
(...) Orion, I feel the same way... unfortunately the posts that go only to lugnet.admin don't show up when you scan thru the posts on the main post menu. I didn't realize this until 2 days ago. There are a lot of posts over there that may not be (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNet shut off
 
I agree totally with this. Please stay Lugnet.... (21 years ago, 17-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNet shut off
 
(...) Well I would like to lend my voice to this. I find lugnet a great resource, and I am happy to promote, or link to it from orionrobots.co.uk. I use lugnet pretty much every day, or at least read the feeds to my mailbox from it. I support you (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) I don't know how to say this without sounding cocky or pompous..... But I try to make sure that Lugnet is THE place where historical and reference information about LEGO that is found NOWHERE ELSE (outside of Billund) can be shared with all (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Or perhaps because it's summer time for many of the posters, terms have ended, and so on. As far as I remember, there has always been a 'summer slump' in the posting frequency. (...) I didn't read her post in exactly that way, but maybe you (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  good afternoon!
 
I woke up late today. Just reading through these posts now. sorry. I'm going to ask that people not speak for me, as in: "I think what Suz is saying is.." because if you're not accurate, I'll want to write a response to correct you. And there will (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: LUGNet shut off
 
(...) Thank you for the reply Lenny. This is a good message on the topic! (...) Hey that's fine! So now we are at least two guys with the same feeling about this. I hope there are some more out there. (...) We all have to work on LUGNet to make it (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) No it's not, it's just that no situation has yet arisen that makes the fact obvious. But think of this : - all of the cool stuff talked about, even at BF'04 isn't going to happen anytime soon, if at all - interest will drop even further - like (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Ditto! I would like to volunteer as well. Now for somebody or some group to hatch a plan. Perhaps Suz and Todd would be willing to help at least transition into something new to help at least stabalize things? (...) Same here, without LUGNET I (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNet shut off
 
(...) -snip- (...) Hey Marco, I am sorry for confusion - I was being a bit coy and cynical. I really doubt that Lugnet will be turned off - Suz has a plan for getting Lugnet to a better position and I have confidence that her plan will work. I too (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Well, I'll chime in with a note in favor of Lugnet. It is my portal to the Lego world 99% of the time. Granted, I only use NNTP, but I still find the set search extremely handy. If Lugnet were to go away, I'm not sure where I'd go, as I just (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Thank you Dave. I love LUGNET very, very much. I remember life before LUGNET. It was a pretty lonely LEGO world for me far from any LUG. I'm very concerned at the consideration of the demise of LUGNET. If it were to happen, it would be a huge (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) I'm still willing to help as an Admin, or in any way I can - please drop me an email when you get a chance or are ready to talk. I'm here. Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 BAYLUG (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Suz- What you and Todd have created is something very, very special. It would be really sad if LUGNET were to go away. Nothing could ever take its place. I know that there are other boards, but they can't really compare with LUGNET's history (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) to the July 12 entry, and then click the "Read More" link. To summarize, apparently Suz is no longer interested in maintaining LUGNET, and its future is uncertain. It sounds like there have been unsuccessful attempts in the past to hand off (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  LUGNET going away?!?
 
(...) So what HAVE you announced, Suz? This is the first I've heard about any such possibility, and I'm very dismayed by it. To me, LUGNET is the place to discuss LEGO. It's also the only web-based forum I can stand to read and post to – I've tried (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) No. If it was better, would Suz be taking the actions she's taking? Don't confuse cause and effect. - Kelly (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) I care as well. I love LUGNET. I love the community here at LUGNET. I love the discussions I've had (and will continue to have) on LUGNET. I personally believe that the AFOL community will lose something pretty spectacular would LUGNET (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) As a matter of interest, how much time does it take you and Todd (and/or whoever) to do the autopilot stuff? From what I can see the biggest regular manual labour is new users, with server and access maintenace the next biggest (including (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) At times I wondered about that. ;) (...) I, for one, do care. You sound rather bitter... which is a real shame. You sound like you are willing Lugnet to fail. I was sad that you all had to "resign", but you must recognise that LUGNET is now a (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
Thanks for all your hard work. Scott A (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
--SNIP-- (...) Hi Rob, I wasn't interpreting your post at all. I realise that my response sounded a little harher than it was intended. Basically all I was trying to say was that you should have been more careful if you were posting an "ahhh, that's (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) I came to here by searching for quite a while after I read (URL) this post> of you Lenny. I searched because I was deeply impressed by the thought LUGNET could die in two month. And I hadn't even heard about this until now! I personally felt (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce, FTX)  
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) [Note - I haven't read the other followups - I'm posting unbiased.] This is just not true. I think there are tons of people who care about LUGNET, but just feel they are not in a position to help out. I run a small server on this computer in (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) That's not what I meant. I didn't intend to imply causation - I would have been more direct about making that assertion. (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Hello Tim. You have every right to have your own opinion on how to interpret my post. Misread, I can understand how someone might think that I thought Lugnet was never calm. This was not my intention. I just noticed heated debates more often (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Lenny, people were having fun elsewhere long before Lugnet was around. Having fun on other forums does not mean people don't care - I for one use Lugnet as a resource regularly, and I think it's value in that area is only rivalled by (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) ... I better watch where I put MY feet? (21 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) This is correct. I'm also trying not to make a lot of noise about it, so as not to be overwhelmed right now. BTW, I have not "announced that unless something happens, Lugnet will be shut off on Oct 1." (...) Yes, that's what's happening, among (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Heh - don't worry too much about that. I generally only trip Keith Goldman and Soren Roberts, and since they aren't coming this year ... (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) My random thought at reading first line above: ...I remember rtl in 1995 getting quiet because of college breaks. But anyway, you're certainly welcome to voice your opinion, Lenny. A not-so-random thought in the back of my mind these days: (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) To be fair, I think that's what's being gauged at the moment. It's true that in recent years, Lugnet's importance as *the* place for Lego discussion has gone down. If I understand correctly, a big part of what's happening now is that Suz is (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
Dear Lenny, --SNIP-- (...) It was unneccasary in my opinion too. If it wasn't intended as a barb it should have been written more carefully, if it was it was unneccesary and rude. (...) I'm not sure I agree with your statement that people stopped (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) Well, I don't like the implication that Lugnet wasn't calm and peaceful BECAUSE of the Admins. As if we wanted everyone to call us names and be mean to us. But honestly, things get quiet because people stop caring. I mean, Suz has announced (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) random thoughts appreciated. random responses: - if developed for such, LUGNET could be self-supportive - You're right about "auto-pilot" but, so's not to worry at this moment.. I'm reading all the posts; Todd and I are in daily communication (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Random thought of the day
 
(...) There are those that say too much fiddlin' spoils the broth. I dunno, I'm of the opinion that if it ain't broke, then why fix it (for the most part) I'll support whatever Suz and Todd come up with as a plan for LUGNET. Dave K (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Random thought of the day
 
I know that Lugnet is going through a big transition, and there is a possibility of its demise... I know lugnet can't be self supportive, can't run on autopilot forever, and needs people to upkeep the many areas (examples, memberships, curator (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) Having read your blog, and having had some insight "behind the screens" I'd like to make the following comments and have some reactions on it, to see if the community could make some new form of LUGNET possible. The biggest value (IMHO) LUGNET (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
Persoanlly, I'm bummed out that this is causing you so much angst, but I'm encouraged that you care that much about it : ) It is hard to be politically correct all the time and I applaud your decision to vent "out of band." (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) LOL. You've shown everyone your true colors now, Lenny! See, I knew you'd say something -just- like this. That's why I got the 'swearing' thing out of the way immediately. ...I even thought about this resopnse all week! thanks for the laugh. (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) If >you< want to use swear-words on your livejournal - why not just change Lugnet's rules concerning swear-words? Lugnet belongs to you and Todd alone - you can make whatever rules you want... right? It's not like a real rule anyway, since it (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) Okay then, I'll post something more official here later. for now... (URL) warned, I use swear-words in my off-lugnet journals. -Suz (21 years ago, 12-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !! 
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) One week now. I'm still looking... -Jason (21 years ago, 12-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) True, but announcement teasers seem to be all the rage these days! (^^) -Suz (21 years ago, 7-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) Well, you don't have to say when you're going to post something. You can just post it when it's ready. Reminds me of when my wife freaks out because she told her class that their papers would be finished by Monday and now it's Sunday and she (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Website status and future plans
 
(...) Okay, okay. So I'm guilty. Once -again- Suz underestimates the length of time required for writing an announcement, circulating it among parties, and tweaking it until ready for consumption. "Darn it, Jim! I'm a LEGO user, not a public (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Suggestion for LUGNET frontpage
 
To those in charge of Lugent these days, I thought I'd make the following suggestion for an addition to the front page of LUGNET whenever a redesign is implemented and such. I'm just throwing this out there because I just thought of it this morning; (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Website status and future plans
 
Look for a major announcement tomorrow regarding LUGNET's future. -Suz (21 years ago, 4-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general) ! 
 
  Re: Problem with Poll results page coding
 
(...) thanks for the kind words. I appreciate its not high on the list of priorities, the poll feature hasn't been used that much and the 5 or so years of Lugnet and I am probably the first person to include multiple pics for each choice. (although (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Problem with Poll results page coding
 
(...) Oh my, that is messed up, isn't it? (*^.^*) Well, I can't fix this myself but I can tell you that the "twice displayed" thing was always there. Todd's choice. Ideally, there'd be more detailed viewing options. Perhaps one of the tech guys here (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
 
(...) I agree. The post was informative and, as far as I can tell, accurate. The summary of problems is invaluable by providing an objective map of trouble spots moving forward. Although the team's work wasn't completely fruitful as originally (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
 
(...) I'm also disappointed about the need for our resignations. It was done in the best interest of LUGNET and the community, though, and not really because of any personal animosity or anything. Having five people resign at once (although two had (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Problem with Poll results page coding
 
There seems to be a problem with the way the results page is coded. If you looks at this page, for example (URL) you can see that the content is displayed twice, once 'without pictures' and once with 'pictures' Apart from being a bit unnecessary, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
 
Kelly, I'm disappointed you resigned. However, I'm also rather disappointed [you] posted this rather divisive message... it smacks of attention seeking to me. I would have thought you and Frank were above this sort of thing. To be perfectly honest, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general) ! 
 
  Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
 
(...) I would like to personally add my name to this. I respect what Suz and Todd have done very much. I love Lugnet, and I hope that it continues to be an important LEGO site. If anyone would like to contact me personally to talk more about why I (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  LUGNET Admin Resignation
 
This note is from Kelly McKiernan, Larry Pieniazek, Lenny Hoffman, Tim Courtney, and Frank Filz. There's been a bit of conversation about the reasons behind these members discontinuing admin duties here at LUGNET. Rather than posting a huge (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: Admin stuff
 
(...) Thanks for coming forward with this offer, Paul! We should probably talk more, via e-mail or telephone, about what you might be able to do. I'm painfully busy right now, but do drop me a note so that we get something started. -Suz (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Legowiki
 
(...) Venkatesh, LUGNET is in the process of "future proofing" itself, so to speak. I'm in Boston having conversations with people and typing up potential directions for the site. Wiki integration is coming up often in my mind. Please contact me if (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Admin stuff
 
Hi, Suzanne & Todd... I'm member #115, and a member of BAYLUH / BAYLTC. Todd has met me a couple of times in person. I would like to offer assistance in whatever way you might need it to maintain LUGNET. (except financial, at the moment) If I can (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) Unfortunately, things are delayed. I got behind in my coursework and didn't make it to Boston yet. But I expect to be there in a few days. -Suz (21 years ago, 8-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) I don't know. -Suz (21 years ago, 3-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
"Suz" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:IHH3C8.Fxy@lugnet.com... (...) Strange that a post the server told me I had already posted still hasn't shown up after 6 hours, but here's the summary: Will your post give the current status and (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) No. I'm flying to Boston again tomorrow. Then writing a post for all which'll hopefully be up Monday. Thanks again for patience.. -Suz (21 years ago, 2-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) There are a few dots (URL) here>. (...) Whilst I'm sure we all agree that it's sad to see some of these guys standing down, it is clear that things were not working as well as they could. It is also evident that Suz and Todd do not have the (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) Amen to that, brother! :-) <shakes head> Daves. Aren't they the wackiest? JOHN (21 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) That was too funny! Oh, man.... lol Haaa...aaahahahaha. man... :) -R (21 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.fun)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
Whoa. I can't say I expected to see this. Good luck to all the former admins and to those that remain as well. -Dave (21 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
To quote Moe Szyslak, "Whaaa...aaa?????" What brought all this on? What are the implications for Lugnet? Thank you to all involved for their past and continuing service to the community. I know you've all worn a bunch of different hats, and please (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) I'd like to thank the former admins for rendering Dave K speechless. And thanks also for your efforts and hard work during your respective tenures. Dave! (21 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) What is the current status of the transition team? Is it still intact? ROSCO (21 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) (clenches fist toward the sky) - Nooo...ooo! e (21 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: admin changes
 
(...) Wow. I'd personally like to thank the former admins for all of their efforts. It was definitely appreciated by me. I'd like to say more, but, for once, I'm pretty much speechless. Dave K (21 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  admin changes
 
It is my unfortunate duty to announce that yesterday, the following admins resigned their positions: Frank Filz, Leonard Hoffman, Kelly McKiernan, and Larry Pieniazek. This came as a shock. Suzanne and I wish to thank Frank, Lenny, Kelly, Larry, and (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !! 
 
  LUGNET News Search Fixed!
 
I'm happy to say that news searches have been fixed! As was noted earlier in (URL) (and a few other places), certain search words were not being returned properly in news searches via the web interface. Both Dan Boger and I worked to fix the issue, (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !! 
 
  Re: LUGNET Site Administration
 
(...) There is progress, not all can be reported. still in the middle of important things. (...) not drifting. (^_^) (...) If the admin problems were not so bad, they'd have been fixed five years ago. (^^) I personally have not received any of your (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: LUGNET Site Administration
 
(...) I second this. I applied for membership over a month ago, paid my membership "fee" and have had numerous e-mails go completely unresponded to. All I would like is my membership number. I've followed all the steps expeditiously and accurately (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: LUGNET Site Administration
 
(...) Patient is my middle name. :) However, is there any news as yet? After you raised my expectations, I'm quietly fearful that things are beginning to drift(?). Although attitudes appear to have changed a little, I think we'd all hate for there (...) (21 years ago, 24-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general) ! 
 
  Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
 
(...) Hey, Sorry to drag up an old discussion, but I just noticed an example of this. In the past hour I have spotlighted two new creations--(URL) Keith's Sato Plaza> and (URL) James' trolley>--and posted one of my own--(URL) track and field (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur wrote: <snip> (...) But who's the more foolish? The fool or the fool who follows him? Dave K -not that I'm in a 'Star Wars' kinda midset right now... ;) (21 years ago, 19-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) ...and some fool has spotlighted your message! Scott A (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
"Scott A" <dr_scott_arthur@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:IGn061.7sD@lugnet.com... (...) <snipage> (...) Too late ! Now we are ALL curious. Cheers Oliver (21 years ago, 19-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 
  Re: This is ridiculous
 
(...) (What tha? I walk away for a year and what happened, my favorite groups are "fading away" ?) ...Oh hey Lenny! Hendo here. I'm still in my Dim Age with all my ABS packed into a renta-cave and most of my time consumed with "real life". But I (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.space, FTX)
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) Just move along and DON'T attract attention to this thread. Scott A (21 years ago, 17-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) Why ask -this- publicly? ...no, nevermind. I already know what you'll say. -Suz (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) Am way way behind on e-mail...didn't see it. I think I found it now. (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) Why ask him this publicly? He answered it privately, in a note you were copied on. (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) Bob, There is actually no procedure or process for this, and membership ID are never reused. By the way, why do you want to cancel? --Todd (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) Just as a note, Bob and I corresponded a bit about this... and Todd's been copied on everything. (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
(...) This is the right group. And you should email Todd. (todd.lehman@lugnet.com) (...) There is currently no automatic functioning for most member services, such as setting up or changes to, etc. It is all done by hand by Todd. Now that Suz has (...) (21 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 
  Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
 
Sorry if this is posted in the wrong group, but I was wondering if you could tell me what steps to take to cancel my membership in Lugnet? If there is no automatic way for me to fill out the withdrawal info, could an Admin please cancel my (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)  
 
  Re: Listen up.
 
(...) Wow, you guys are really good at this! Selecting a winner will be difficult. I was impressed with (URL) this clever response> but Bruce disqualified himself by not posting it over the course of five days. (...and it wasn't an emergency.) -Suz (21 years ago, 10-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 100 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR