Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:31:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2896 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
Kelly,
I’m disappointed you resigned. However, I’m also rather disappointed you
posted this rather divisive message... it smacks of attention seeking to me.
|
I’m also disappointed about the need for our resignations. It was done in the
best interest of LUGNET and the community, though, and not really because of
any personal animosity or anything. Having five people resign at once
(although two had basically retired previously) was cause enough for
explanation to the LUGNET community. We all felt we owed that to everyone.
|
I agree. The post was informative and, as far as I can tell, accurate. The
summary of problems is invaluable by providing an objective map of trouble spots
moving forward. Although the team’s work wasn’t completely fruitful as
originally outlined, we now have a real record of what can go wrong.
As for how things “went down”, Kelly’s right. Things are okay. If anything, I
bungled communications a bit by being overly emotional, and by not acting in a
proceedurally respectful way.
But thanks, Scott. I’m glad you spoke up because I’d hate for you or others to
go on with an inaccurate perception.
...Yo Man, it’s kool. It’s kool.
-Suz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LUGNET Admin Resignation
|
| (...) I'm also disappointed about the need for our resignations. It was done in the best interest of LUGNET and the community, though, and not really because of any personal animosity or anything. Having five people resign at once (although two had (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jun-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
