Subject:
|
Re: Random thought of the day
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:17:07 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3359 times
|
| |
 | |
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > I know that Lugnet is going through a big transition, and there is a
> > possibility of its demise...
> >
> > I know lugnet can't be self supportive, can't run on autopilot forever, and
> > needs people to upkeep the many areas (examples, memberships, curator
> > changes, etc.)...
> >
> > I'm not exactly sad to see the admins go; I know their presence was
> > [somewhat] needed for everyday information flow among other duties...
> >
> > BUT
> >
> > Haven't you noticed how calm and peaceful Lugnet has been for the past few
> > weeks?
>
> Well, I don't like the implication that Lugnet wasn't calm and peaceful BECAUSE
> of the Admins. As if we wanted everyone to call us names and be mean to us.
At times I wondered about that. ;)
>
> But honestly, things get quiet because people stop caring. I mean, Suz has
> announced that unless something happens, Lugnet will be shut off on Oct 1. If
> anyone had made that claim two years ago, do you think there would be this
> quasi-silent acceptance? People just don't care whether Lugnet lives or dies,
> and they have more fun on other forums anyways.
I, for one, do care.
You sound rather bitter... which is a real shame. You sound like you are willing
Lugnet to fail.
I was sad that you all had to "resign", but you must recognise that LUGNET is
now a tiny bit better than it was?
Scott A
>
> -Lenny
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:  | | Re: Random thought of the day
|
| (...) No it's not, it's just that no situation has yet arisen that makes the fact obvious. But think of this : - all of the cool stuff talked about, even at BF'04 isn't going to happen anytime soon, if at all - interest will drop even further - like (...) (20 years ago, 15-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Random thought of the day
|
| (...) Well, I don't like the implication that Lugnet wasn't calm and peaceful BECAUSE of the Admins. As if we wanted everyone to call us names and be mean to us. But honestly, things get quiet because people stop caring. I mean, Suz has announced (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
47 Messages in This Thread:   
    
    
        
       
        
      
      
      
    
      
       
     
   
   
               ![LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day] -Suzanne Rich Green (19-Jul-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day] -Dan Boger (19-Jul-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
           ![Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day] -Jan-Albert van Ree (19-Jul-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day] -Suzanne Rich Green (19-Jul-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
           ![Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day] -Todd Lehman (19-Jul-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: LUGNET's code [was: Random thought of the day] -Timothy Gould (19-Jul-05 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
             
       
         
    
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|