Subject:
|
Re: Random thought of the day
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:45:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4198 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Ray Sanders wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Suzanne Rich Green wrote:
> > [...] before anyone even thinks about coding something, they need to deal
> > with those other blocks first, else there's no point.
> >
> > I'll post some pieces of my conversations with other people to the
> > LUGNET blog later. Those will provide more info. That'd be easier for me.
>
> I'm not an insider at LUGNET and I've never seen the code or heard about until
> the remarks here.[...] Based on the sesibility of your remarks so
> far, I'm real curious to hear about "those other blocks". I have a few
> suspicions, but I'll wait until it becomes more clear.
Hi, Ray! Short answer (quoting a friend):
a) Lugnet needs a sustainable governing mechanism.
b) Lugnet needs a sustainable revenue source.
c) etc...
There are all kinds of possibile aproaches to those first two blocks, but 'A'
might mean returning to a model like the "Suz & Todd" one with the addition of
some guideline documents. I'd recommend that LUGNET stay away from
moderation-type issues. The 'B' block has potential sources in dues from the
LUGs, assuming LUGNET were to develop with them as a client and offer them an
attractive tools and a model. But, it's hard to woow to the LUGs without some
development, and it's impossible to develop without financial support.
-Suz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Random thought of the day
|
| (...) I'm not an insider at LUGNET and I've never seen the code or heard about until the remarks here. I have been a coder/designer (and whatever terms apply) at various shops over the years and I *have* seen code where calling it 'patched' would (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
47 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
