To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.year.2002Open lugnet.year.2002 in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Year / 2002 / 168
167  |  169
Subject: 
Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.year.2002
Date: 
Fri, 2 Nov 2001 14:32:25 GMT
Viewed: 
1869 times
  
In lugnet.year.2002, Kevin Johnston writes:

Perhaps Lego has something better lined up here, like an
exclusive contract that keeps other stuff off the shelves.

I don't know if this answers the issue as for Galidor, but here is a little more
info...

http://216.191.209.135/articles/magazine/20011001/lmbriefs.html?word=galidor

From the article:
"As merchandising rights owner, Lego holds master toy and software licenses and
is currently negotiating with licensing agents. The first phase of product,
which is tentatively slated to start rolling out in North America next summer,
will include categories like action figures, books and video games."

I have no clue what the "master license" designation entails.

-Jim



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
 
(...) I think this means they have most major toy categories locked up (including the "action figure" segment). On the one hand, it means they will be able to stand out better (unlike the Bob the Builder sets, as I mentioned previously), but on the (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
  Re: More POOPs and licenses (Galidor)
 
(...) I think more important is the first bit from the quote, which says that LEGO owns all merchandising rights. Any company that wants to make Galidor toys, has to get a license from Lego. Which means that Lego is on the upstream side of any (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
 
(...) Yep, I remember that as well. Guess all the critics that this was the thin edge of a wedge were right after all. (...) Completely agreed on the risk. What a crock. I think the Bob sets will be a failure (or passable success) for the simple (...) (23 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.year.2002)

68 Messages in This Thread:






































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR