Year 2002 : 160


Year / 2002 / 160	159 \| 161

Subject:	Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.year.2002
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2001 20:43:26 GMT
Viewed:	1829 times

In lugnet.year.2002, Eric Kingsley writes: > Jurassic Park should never have been done, who > needs a license to sell dinosaurs I wonder about that every time I see a zillion of those sets still setting on the shelves. Could it be that, in order to secure the Spielberg/LEGO Studios deal, it was necessary to license Jurassic Park III? Is there any way to find out? Dave!

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: More POOPs and licenses (was Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB)
(...) Oh well... Just continuing the downward spin in terms of LEGO and Licensing. I remember when the Star Wars License was announced (TLC's First), that it was made clear that TLC was looking for long term relationships with products that have as (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)

68 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search