Subject:
|
Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.year.2002
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:38:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1860 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.year.2002, Richard Noeckel writes:
> Second, WHAT IS UP WITH THE MINI_MINIFIG LEGS?!?
>
> Do the Ewoks and Gobblins have half-legs?
>
> The heads and tourso/body sections seam normal...
>
> But the LEGS, i don't get the legs?
>
> Hopefully the high-rez pictures will clairify.
> If not, could Tim just tell us if legs are a new
> 'stubby' version of the old ones?
Stubbies is my guess (can I coin that phrase now, for everyone to use for
the rest of time?) [1]
This would make sense for the future Yoda figure too. And HP house-elves.
And children. And...well, you see the possibilities can go on and on...
Matt
[1] (Stubbies ©2001, Matthew Gerber)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | 'Stubbies' (C) Richard Noeckel!
|
| (...) You sooooo can NOT! I claim infringement of my term… >:-\ I used it first, I put brackets around it… It’s rightfully mine!?! That goes for TLG too! (They can’t use the term with out first consulting me.) Hello, I did initiate the whole (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2002 catalog scans at FBTB
|
| (...) First i'd like to thank Tim, Second, WHAT IS UP WITH THE MINI_MINIFIG LEGS?!? Do the Ewoks and Gobblins have half-legs? The heads and tourso/body sections seam normal... But the LEGS, i don't get the legs? Hopefully the high-rez pictures will (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.year.2002)
|
68 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
